Legal Opinion
In re Carpel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 18, 1917PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Disciplinary proceedings instituted by the Association of the Bar of the City of New York.
1Opinion of the Court
Clarke, P. J.:
The respondent in February, 1905, was admitted upon motion to practice as an attorney and counselor at law by the Appellate Division, First Department.
The petition alleges that in June, 1896, respondent was admitted to practice in the courts of the city and county of Philadelphia and in the Orphan’s Court, and in October, 1899, he was admitted to practice in the Superior Court of the State of Pennsylvania. In April, 1901, he was indicted in the city of Philadelphia upon the charge of stealing a gold watch which he had received from a client to deposit as security for a bail…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re PritchettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- In re MoskovitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- In re QuitmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- In re BackusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re KleinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- In re GrossmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re HughesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- In Re HyraSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- In Re HyraSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954