Legal Opinion

In re Backus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 5, 1912PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Application by an attorney admitted to practice in the State of Pennsylvania to be admitted to practice in the courts of this State.

1Per curiam

The applicant was admitted to practice in the several courts in the forty-eighth judicial district of the State of Pennsylvania, but was- never admitted to practice in the Supreme Court of that State, as is necessary to entitle him to practice in that court, which is the highest court in the State of Pennsylvania. Although, the courts in which the applicant has been admitted are courts of the highest original jurisdiction, that does not entitle him to admission here without examina^ tion. The rulés of the Court of Appeals and the General Buies of Practice of the Supreme Court provide that in…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re CarpelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API