Legal Opinion
City of Kingsport, Tennessee v. SCM Corporation
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided March 17, 1972No. Civ. A. 2639PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NEESE, District Judge.
The motion of the defendant SCM Corporation of September 30, 1971 to amend its answer has been rendered MOOT. XI(b) of the pretrial order herein of October 12, 1971.
The motion of such defendant to join St. Paul Fire and Marine Company in its cross claim against its codefendant Special Coatings, Inc., Rules 13(g) (h), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; to file a counterclaim against the plaintiffs Cassel Bros., Inc. and Johnson-Hilliard, Inc., Rule 13(f), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and to join as defendants-by-counterclaim Steel and Roof…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- June v. George C. Peterson Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
- Jackson v. KempTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
- S. P. A. Ricordi Officine Grafiche v. World Art Reproductions Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Whitlow v. Hardin Co., Tenn.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1930
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ostrander v. Cone Mills, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
- City of Kingsport v. SCM CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1972
- Delano v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2012
- State ex rel. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. RickhoffMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- Huggins v. FultonDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1980