Legal Opinion
S. P. A. Ricordi Officine Grafiche v. World Art Reproductions Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 6, 1958PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BICKS, District Judge.
The defendant has moved pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 13(h), 28 U.S.C.A., to bring in Artistic Imports, Inc. as a defendant to the end that it may be afforded complete relief in the determination of one of the counterclaims asserted in the answer.
The suit stems from a written agreement between plaintiff, an Italian corporation, and defendant, a New York corporation. This agreement is in the English language and gives evidence of having been prepared by individuals accustomed to speaking in a foreign tongue. The result is a document which, insofar as giving clear and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Indianapolis v. Chase Nat. BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- City of Indianapolis v. Chase National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United Artists Corporation v. Masterpiece Productions, Inc., and Robert S. Benjamin, Arthur B. Krim, Seymour M. PeyserCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Lesnik v. Public Industrials CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- King v. Edward B. Marks Music CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Reed v. StreibWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- State of Washington v. American Pipe & Construction Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1968
- Clarke v. Civil Service CommissionHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
- Ambrose v. Harrison Mutual Insurance AssociationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Markus v. DillingerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.