State v. Schwenke
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIS, Judge:
11 Plaintiff A. Paul Schwenke appeals his conviction for securities fraud. He argues, among other things, that the elements of securities fraud were not proven and that the trial court erred in allowing certain evidence to be presented to the jury. We affirm.
BACKGROUND 1
12 Schwenke created a corporation called American-Dairy.com, Inc. (American-Dairy). The business plan was to get several dairy farms together and form a publicly traded company. Upon meeting the victims here, Schwenke introduced his colleague, Jamis Johnson, as a lawyer and an expert in stocks, but Schwenke…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Landreth Timber Co. v. LandrethSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Jau-Fei Chen v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. LarsenUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Brookside Mobile Home Park, Ltd. v. PeeblesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. TokiCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
- State v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
- State v. FeatherhatCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
- May v. BigelowCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
- A.J. State v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.