Legal Opinion

A.J. State v. State

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided May 8, 2014No. 20140103-CAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Decision

2Per curiam

{1 AJ. (Mother) appeals the termination of her parental rights. We affirm.

12 Mother first asserts that the juvenile court erred in allowing the guardian ad litem to exceed the scope of direct examination in cross-examining a Division of Child and Family Services (DCFS) caseworker. Mother implies that the entirety of the testimony elicited from the caseworker by the guardian ad litem should be disregarded. However, the transcript shows that Mother made only one objection to the questioning. Mother objected to the guardian ad litem's question concerning the condition of the children…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. B.R.Utah Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State Ex Rel. E.R.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2001
  3. State v. SchwenkeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API