Gonzales v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice ROSS.
Antonio Gonzales has appealed from his convictions for aggravated assault and possession of a deadly weapon in a penal institution. He contended in his original appeal that the court erred by refusing to permit him to voir dire the jury panel on the defense of necessity, 1 by excluding evidence relevant to establishing that defense, and by commenting on defense counsel’s representation. We reversed and remanded for a new trial based on the trial court’s refusal to allow defense counsel to voir dire the jury on the defense of necessity. In that opinion we…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Morgan v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Dinkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Allridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Burruss v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
- Arnwine v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
- Washington v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
- Rivera v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
- Tijerina v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.