Tijerina v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING
SUE WALKER, Justice.
Following the issuance of our original opinion, the State filed a motion for rehearing arguing that the error in the case was harmless. We deny the State’s motion for rehearing, but we withdraw our opinion and judgment issued February 2, 2006, and substitute the following in their place to more fully address the harm analysis.
I. Introduction
Appellant Debra Tijerina appeals her conviction for possession of methamphetamine of less than one gram. The controlling issue in this appeal is whether a distinction exists between the voir dire question in this…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Mosley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Ladd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Unkart, Rodney GaleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Vann v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Cardenas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
- RODRIGUEZ-FLORES v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2011
- Monique Renee Braxton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.