Legal Opinion
Roy L. Willard, Inc. v. Miller
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided May 1, 1942PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHAPMAN, J.:
The question presented for adjudication on this appeal is whether or not appellant’s second amended declaration, consisting of two counts, states a cause of action. The Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, sustained a demurrer to the second amended declaration, and each count thereof, thereby holding that the second amended declaration failed to state a cause of action. Count 1 is viz.:
“1. That at all times herein mentioned the plaintiff was, ever since has been and now is engaged in the plastering business, performing work as a plastering subcontractor for general building…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hazen v. Cobb-Vaughan Motor Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1928
- Poinsettia Dairy Products, Inc. v. the Wessel Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Sullivan v. McMillanSupreme Court of Florida · 1890
- Duggan v. Matthew Cummings Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Disken v. HerterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McKinney-Green, Inc. v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Pennsylvania v. Curtiss National Bank of Miami SpringsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Petitt v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- State of Pennsylvania, by and Through Paul Silverstein, as Special Deputy Insurance Commissioner v. Curtiss National Bank of Miami Springs, Florida, Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. National Western Life Insurance Company, Third Party Defendants-Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Fontainebleau Hotel v. WaltersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970