Legal Opinion

Hazen v. Cobb-Vaughan Motor Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 10, 1928PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This is an action brought in both general and special assumpsit. The real object of the suit was to recover damages for breach of a special contract of employment, as we judge from what appears in the record and the briefs. That is, the salary and commissions appear to have been substantially paid up to the time of the discharge, but plaintiff claims a wrongful discharge long before the period fixed by his contract for employment had expired. On account of adverse rulings on the pleadings and evidence, plaintiff below, plaintiff in error here, introduced, practically not testimony and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. McMillanSupreme Court of Florida · 1890
  2. Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company v. Knapp and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1835
  3. Atlanta & St. Andrews Bay Railway Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  4. Tunno v. RobertSupreme Court of Florida · 1878
  5. Price v. Western Loan & Savings Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. Commerce v. EquityDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Yates v. BallSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  3. Universal Const. Co. v. City of Fort LauderdaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  4. Paddock v. Bay Concrete Industries, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  5. Shibata v. LimDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2000

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API