Legal Opinion
Bickham v. Selcke
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided June 28, 1991No. 1-89-3198PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE GREIMAN
delivered the opinion of the court:
The defendants, Stephen F. Selcke, the Director of the Illinois Department of Professional Regulation, and the Illinois Department of Professional Regulation (the Department), initiated this interlocutory appeal following an order by the circuit court of Cook County remanding this matter for a new administrative hearing based on an alleged procedural error, i.e., the hearing officer’s denial of a continuance requested by an attorney for the plaintiff, Dr. Arnold Bickham, on March 9, 1988.
The Department contends that the plaintiff has been…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Scott v. Department of Commerce & Community AffairsIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Brown v. Air Pollution Control BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Wegmann v. Department of Registration & EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Giampa v. Illinois Civil Service CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ardt v. Illinois Department of Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Wilson v. Department of Professional RegulationAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- Jones v. Police Board of City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- James L. Hafele & Associates v. Department of Employment SecurityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Matter of Termination of WongMontana Supreme Court · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.