Legal Opinion

Lehigh Presbytery v. Merchants Bancorp, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 16, 1991No. 2857PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEWEN, Judge:

This appeal has been taken from judgment entered following denial of appellant’s motion for post-trial relief. The trial court, in reliance upon Section 9 of the Uniform Fiduciaries Act, Act of 1923, May 31, P.L. 468, § 9, 7 P.S. § 6393, held that the appellee, Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (hereinafter Bank), was not liable to appellant for the value of negotiable instruments credited to the personal account of an employee of appellant. We find that the Uniform Fiduciaries Act is inapplicable to the facts of this case and therefore reverse.

Ms. Mary Ann Hunsberger was hired by the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Underpinning & Foundation Constructors, Inc. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Jones v. Van NormanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Robinson Protective Alarm Co. v. Bolger & PickerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Levy v. First Pennsylvania Bank N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Cairo Coop. Exchange v. First Nat'l Bank of CunninghamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Springfield Township v. Mellon PSFS BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Manfredi v. Dauphin Deposit BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. State of Qatar v. First American Bank of VirginiaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
  4. Peaceman v. PNC Bank, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1996
  5. Springfield Township v. Mellon PSFS BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API