Legal Opinion

Ford v. Barnard, Sumner & Putnam Co.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 23, 1973PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeville, J.

This is a bill of exceptions in an action of contract in two counts for breach of express and implied warranties of fitness and merchantability in the sale of a cosmetic product. The trial judge in the Superior Court at the close of the evidence denied the defendant’s motion for directed verdicts. The defendant took exception to the judge’s ruling and the jury returned verdicts for the plaintiff.

In January, 1969, the plaintiff went to the cosmetic department of the defendent’s store and asked a sales person for “Genava” cream, a facial cosmetic which had been advertised in a Sunday newspaper…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lanners v. WhitneyOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Guthrie v. J. J. Newberry Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Nugent v. Popular Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
  4. Warren's Kiddie Shoppe, Inc. v. Casual Slacks, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  5. Petrangelo v. PollardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. Delano Growers' Cooperative Winery v. Supreme Wine Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API