Legal Opinion

Orenstein v. United States. United States v. Orenstein

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided August 22, 1951No. 4557_1PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAGRUDER, Chief Judge.

These are cross-appeals from a judgment under § 206(b) of the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, as amended, 61 Stat. 199, 63 Stat. 27, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1896(b), ordering restitution to two tenants of the amount of rent overcharges, and enjoining the landlord from further violations. Though the case is a small one, we have had some difficulty in deciding what to do with it.

The housing accommodation in question was the first-floor apartment of a two-family dwelling house at 169 Mountfort Street, Brookline, Massachusetts, which .was owned by the defendant Orenstein during…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Parsons v. Bedford, Breedlove, & RobesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  4. Arnstein v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  5. Hepner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Leimer v. Woods, Housing ExpediterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
  2. Superior Construction Co. v. ElmoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  3. Commonwealth v. ElderMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. Rowell v. KaplanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
  5. United States v. Robert S. WylieCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API