Legal Opinion

Gollar v. City of Louisville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 12, 1920PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Chancery Branch, Second Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge -Quin

Affirming.

Plaintiff (appellant) is-attacking the validity of an authorized issue of $2,000,000.00 of bonds for the extension of the sewage system of the city of Louisville.

This is a companion suit to that of Ahrens v. City of Louisville, 186 Ky. 585, 217 S. W. 907, in which opinion, while disposing of certain objections to this same bond issue, we expressly refrained from passing upon the validity of the bonds, because of the insufficiency of the petition as to the alleged failure to properly publish and give notice of the ordinance authorizing the issue and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McCreary v. SpeerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  2. Hatfield v. City of CovingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  3. Central Construction Co. v. City of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. City of Newport v. GlazierCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  5. Stuessy v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Skaggs v. Fyffe, JudgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  2. In Re East Bay Etc. Water Bonds of 1925California Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Dutton v. TawesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  4. Weisgerber v. Nez Perce CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  5. State Ex Rel. City of Berkeley v. HolmesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API