Legal Opinion
SCHEINUK FLORIST, INC. v. Southern Bell T. & T. Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 20, 1961No. 42PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
128 So.2d 683 (1961)
SCHEINUK THE FLORIST, INC.
v.
SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY.
No. 42.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.
March 20, 1961.
Rehearing Denied April 24, 1961.
Certiorari Denied May 30, 1961.
Ogden, Woods, Henriques & Rives, James W. Hammet, James C. Henriques, Jr., New Orleans, for defendant and appellant.
Hammett & Bertel, Harry L. Hammett, New Orleans, for plaintiff and appellee.
Before REGAN, YARRUT and SAMUEL, JJ.
REGAN, Judge.
Plaintiff, Scheinuk the Florist, Inc., instituted this suit against the defendant, Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Company,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brantley v. Tremont & Gulf Railway Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
- Cust v. Item Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- McCoy v. Arkansas Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
- Friedman Iron & Supply Co. v. J. B. Beaird Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
- Murff v. Louisiana Highway CommissionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Behrend v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. LevySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
- Wilson v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Irish v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1972
- Central La. Elec. Co. v. Pointe Coupee Elec. Mem. Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.