Legal Opinion
Cust v. Item Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided April 27, 1942No. 36269PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’NIELL, Chief Justice.
The plaintiff is appealing from a judgment dismissing her suit on an exception of no cause or right of action. The suit is for damages for an alleged breach of contract by a third party, Mrs. Concldin C. Barry. The plaintiff avers that an employee of the defendant, Item Company, acting within the scope of his employment, induced Mrs. Barry to breach the contract. And for that Mrs. Cust is demanding of the Item Company $5,646 damages.
The right of action of course depends upon the following facts recited in Mrs. Cust’s petition. She resides in Danville, Virginia. In…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Moulin v. MonteleoneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Blanchard v. HaberSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
- Kline v. EubanksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
- Hartman v. GreeneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
- B. J. Wolf & Sons v. New Orleans Tailor-Made Pants Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- 9 to 5 Fashions, Inc. v. SpurneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Harvey v. Travelers Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
- Smith v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
- Hamilton v. Canal Barge Company, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1975
- Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Whitney National BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.