Hibbs v. Allstate Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GILBERT, P. J.
An automobile insurance policy allows the insurer the option to pay for damages to an insured vehicle or to repair it. We conclude that the insurer satisfies its contractual obligation when it elects to repair, although the insured refuses to authorize the repairs.
The insurer may be liable in bad faith, however, when it pays for repairs not authorized by the insured, and then recovers from the tortfeasor in subrogation because the subrogation action may be prejudicial to the insured’s direct action against the tortfeasor.
We reverse the trial court’s grant of summary…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
- Chatton v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Jordan v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Szadolci v. Hollywood Park Operating Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Ray v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Baldwin v. AAA Northern California, Nevada & Utah Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Nuvision Fed. Credit Union v. Beliciu CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Vasquez v. Solo 1 Kustoms, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2018