Cyph, Inc. v. Zoom Communication, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CYPH, INC., Case No. 22-cv-00561-JSW 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND 9 v. DENYING, IN PART, MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED 10 ZOOM VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, COMPLAINT INC., Re: Dkt. No. 54 11 Defendant. 12 13 Now before the Court for consideration is the motion to dismiss filed by Zoom Video 14 Communications, Inc. (“Zoom”). The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal 15 authority, and the record in this case, and it HEREBY GRANTS, IN PART, AND DENIES, IN 16 PART, Zoom’s motion, with leave to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jerry L. Branch, Valenna Branch, Colby Branch v. Dale L. Tunnell, Individually and as Special Agent of Bureau of Land Management, State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.