Legal Opinion · Dissent

Anderson Ex Rel. Estate of McLees v. Green Bull, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 8, 1996No. 2491Published

1DissentHowell, Chief Judge

I respectfully dissent. The majority concludes the trial *275judge erred in refusing to grant a directed verdict or judgment notwithstanding the verdict. I would hold the trial judge properly found the issues in this case were for the jury’s determination, and affirm.

In every action the plaintiff must establish the elements of his cause of action. This is an action in strict liability, and Anderson had the burden of establishing the ladder as manufactured was unreasonably dangerous, and the dangerous condition proximately caused the injury. Whether Anderson met this burden was a question of law,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mickle v. BlackmonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  2. Crossley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  3. Fleming v. Borden, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  4. Bragg v. Hi-Ranger, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
  5. Claytor v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API