Legal Opinion

Crossley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 2, 1992No. 23590PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Chief Justice:

This is an action for breach of an insurance contract. The jury awarded respondent Clarence A. Crossley both actual and punitive damages based on its determination that appellant State Farm (State Farm) breached its implied covenant of good faith and acted willfully or in reckless disregard of respondent’s rights under the contract. State Farm alleges that the trial judge committed various errors. We affirm in part as modified, and reverse in part.

I. FACTS

Respondent applied for health insurance through State Farm on September 22,1988. He denied any adverse medical…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nichols v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  2. Woodward v. ToddSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  3. Moore v. Palmetto State Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  4. Poston v. National Fidelity Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  5. Johnson v. Wabash Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Jimmy Myrick v. Prime Insurance Syndicate, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  3. Welch v. EpsteinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Taylor v. MedenicaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  5. Fleming v. Borden, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API