Legal Opinion

America-Asia Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 4, 1968No. P68/98; protests 65/19661, etc. (Los Angeles)Published

1Opinion of the CourtWatson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “B” covered by the foregoing protests consist of rattancore coolie hat planters, sleighs, modern shaped trays, serving trays, snack trays, and'hanging planters similar in all material respects to those the subject of Royal Cathay Trading Co. and W. J. Byrnes & Co. et al. v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 371, C.D. 2662); that the items of merchandise marked “C” consist of trays, serving trays, snack trays, display trees, etc., which are in no part of rattan, similar in all *1008material respects to those the subject of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Royal Cathay Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Imported Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  3. Quon Quon Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API