Legal Opinion
Mendoza Lopez v. Weyerhaeuser Company
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided October 13, 2023No. 6:22-cv-00882Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION AMALIA FELICITA MENDOZA LOPEZ, 6:22-cv-00882-AA OPINION & ORDER Plaintiff, v. WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY; DIAL TEMPORARY HELP SERVICE, INC. Defendants. _______________________________________ AIKEN, District Judge. In this employment discrimination action, plaintiff alleges sexual harassment and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, and failure to provide reasonable safety and accommodation and retaliation under Oregon state law. Plaintiff asserts claims against defendant Weyerhaeuser NR Company…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Reloynne K. Villiarimo Joseph Harvest v. Aloha Island Air, Inc., Dba Island Air Rosie Nenezich Richard HeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Clackamas Gastroenterology Associates, P. C. v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.