Legal Opinion

People v. Hicks

California Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1965No. Crim. No. 9115PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment, after a jury trial, finding him guilty on two counts of violating section 459 of the Penal Code (burglary), two counts of violating section 288a of the Penal Code (sex perversions), and one count of violating section 286 of the Penal Code (crime against nature). The burglaries were found to be of the first degree.

Facts: On February 21, 1963, defendant entered a house with intent to commit a felony against a certain young female. After entering, he committed three sex offenses upon her. These offenses consisted of two violations of section 288a of the Penal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. SlobodionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. People v. WinthropCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. People v. GayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. People v. TennerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. In re WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. People v. VenegasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API