Legal Opinion

Daane v. Lovell

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 1978No. Docket 77-773PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs ward, Bertha Lehto, gave her niece, Angela Lovell, a deed to her farm, retaining only a life estate. Plaintiff brought suit for cancellation of the deed, alleging undue influence and failure of consideration. The trial court held that the deed was a valid gift. We affirm.

In this chancery case we review de novo, examining the entire record, weighing all of the evidence and subjecting the trial court’s findings of fact to closer scrutiny than we would employ on review of a jury verdict. Kar v Hogan, 399 Mich 529, 546; 251 NW2d 77, 82 (1976), Tuttle v Department of State Highways, 397…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. In Re Wood EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Kar v. HoganMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Mazur v. BlendeaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Nelson v. WigginsMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McMullen v. JoldersmaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. In Re Conant EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. In Re DUKE ESTATEMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. United States v. PorathDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
  5. Price v. HolmesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API