Legal Opinion

United States v. Porath

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 3, 2011No. Case 08-10166PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR JURY TRIAL AND DETERMINATION FOLLOWING TRIAL BY THE COURT WITHOUT A JURY

DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge.

The United States has filed a complaint against defendants Gordon and Georgina Porath to foreclose a tax lien on the Poraths’ house in Brighton, Michigan, currently titled in Mrs. Porath’s name. An assessment was made against defendant Gordon Porath on October 28, 1991 for unpaid income and Social Security taxes withheld from Mr. Porath’s company. The government contends that in 1991, Mr. Porath transferred his interest in the house to his spouse in…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Aquilino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Felice (In re Felice)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
  2. United States v. LongDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014
  3. Caldwell Company v. YousifDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
  4. Dombrowski v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
  5. United States of America v. Don Kramer and Oakland County TreasurerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API