Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Offutt

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 3, 1935No. 6436PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRONER, Associate Justice.

This appeal involves the single question : Is a stockholder of the Potomac Savings Bank of Georgetown, D. G, an insolvent Virginia banking corporation, subject to double assessment under the District of Columbia laws?

The bank was incorporated in Virginia in 1903 “to conduct a savings bank in the city of Washington.” It established a *736banking house in Washington and nowhere else. Its liabilities, contracts, debts, and engagements were incurred there, and its assets are located there.

It is agreed that neither the articles of incorporation, the by-laws, nor any provision…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pinney v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Brunswick T. Co. v. NAT. BK. OF BALTIMORESupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Washington Loan & Trust Co. v. AllmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1934
  4. Harper v. MoranCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1935

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Moran v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
  2. Thompson v. Park Sav. BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  3. Dunn v. O'CONNORCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
  4. Hamilton v. BerglingCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
  5. Moran v. CobbCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API