Legal Opinion
Thode v. McAmis
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 6, 1950No. Civ. 7722PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
The appellants herein are copartners doing business under the firm name of Thode & Sons Lumber Company. As plaintiffs in the trial court they brought an' action to recover from defendants Jester, Stockwell and Henderson, copartners doing business as The Woodcraft Shop, the value of certain materials sold by them to said defendants and by said defendants used in the construction of a dwelling house for defendants L. C. McAmis and Virginia McAmis, husband and wife. Against the property of the defendants McAmis they sought foreclosure of a materialman’s lien. They also sought to recover from…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Woodhead Lumber Co. v. E. G. Niemann Investments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- French v. FarmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Sunset Lumber Co. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Shaw v. McCaslinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- W. R. Spalding Lumber Co. v. FradkinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gribaldo, Jacobs, Jones & Associates v. Agrippina Versicherunges A. G.California Supreme Court · 1970
- Sunset-Sternau Food Co. v. BonziCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Greenblatt v. GoldinSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Glens Falls Indemnity Company, a Corporation, and E. F. Grandy, Inc., a Corporation v. American Seating Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Lincoln v. Narom Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.