Legal Opinion
Gaunt v. Allen Lane Co.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided March 12, 1929PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPhilbeooK, J.
On report. Action in trover to recover damages for the alleged conversion of mill machinery. Demand and refusal are conceded. The property described in the plaintiff’s declaration is as follows:
Twelve looms, including loom motors, harnesses, beams, shuttles, reeds, 82"25 harness 4x4 box, heavy worsted, with motors, 1 HP 550 volt, together of the value of seventy-two hundred dollars, one Universal Winder of the value of two hundred dollars, one 60KW generator and connection, of the value of eight hundred dollars, five motors, together of the value of six hundred • dollars, two *43Houston sewing…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mills v. Taunton Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Porter v. Pittsburg Bessemer Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Fuller-Warren Co. v. HarterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Porter v. Pittsburg Bessemer Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Parsons v. ParsonsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Clayton v. LienhardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Lewiston Bottled Gas Co. v. Key Bank of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Wedge v. ButlerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1939
- Bezanson v. Kennebunk Savings Bank (In Re Ladd)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1982
- Vorsec Co. v. GilkeySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.