Legal Opinion

Porter v. Pittsburg Bessemer Steel Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 7, 1887No. 1280PublishedCited by 44 opinions

APPEAi EEOM THE - CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OE INDIANA. These were five appeals brought by Henry H. Porter, in which.the Pittsburg Bessemer Steel Company (Limited), the Cleveland Rolling Mill Company, the Smith Bridge Company, Crerar, Adams & Company, and Yolney Q. Irwin are severally ' appellees.

Read the full summary

APPEAi EEOM THE - CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OE INDIANA. These were five appeals brought by Henry H. Porter, in which.the Pittsburg Bessemer Steel Company (Limited), the Cleveland Rolling Mill Company, the Smith Bridge Company, Crerar, Adams & Company, and Yolney Q. Irwin are severally ' appellees. The material facts out of which the questions for consideration arose were as follows: In Márch, 1880, the Indiana and Chicago Railway Company was incorporated to construct and operate a railroad from a point on the state fine of Indiana, in Lake County, to Attica, in…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blatcheord

It it alleged that the Circuit Court erred in decreeing the several claims of these five appellees to be liens.on the railroad and property of. the original Chicago and Great 'Southern Bailway Company superior to the lien of the mortgage of November 1, 1881; and that it also erred in decreeing these claims to be liens on the railroad and property of the consolidated company superior to the lien of the mortgage of April 9, 1883, conveying the railroad and property formerly known as the Chicago and Block Coal railroad.

It is urged, in maintenance of'the decree below, that the relations which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Graham v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Pulllman's Palace Car Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Thomas v. Brownville, Fort Kearney, & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Toledo, St. L. & K. C. R. v. Continental Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
  2. Toledo, Delphos & Burlington Railroad v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Porter v. Pittsburg Bessemer Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Fuller-Warren Co. v. HarterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Decatur Mineral Land Co. v. PalmSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API