Legal Opinion

Cashhin v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 18, 1916No. 6965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Accusation of misdemeanor; from Wilkes superior court— Judge Walker. September 21, 1915.

1Opinion of the CourtWade, J.

1. Since the offense charged is a purely statutory offense (Youmans v. State, 7 Ga. App. 101, 113, 66 S. E. 383), the court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the indictment, -which alleged a violation of section 434 of the Penal Code in the terms and language of the code, and so plainly that the nature of the offense charged could be easily understood by the jury. Penal Code, § 954; Ricks V. State, 16 Ga. 600 (3). See, in this connection, Rose v. State, 1 Ga. App. 596 (58 S. E. 20). It is unnecessary to allege the name of the agent through -whom, or the agency by which, or the manner…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Youmans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Loeb v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  3. Rose v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Elsbery v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  5. Hill v. ChastainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Day v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  2. Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API