Legal Opinion

Matter of SAM Oil, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1991No. 900327PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

SAM Oil, Inc., seeks a writ of review of a decision of the Utah Board of Oil, Gas and Mining (“the Board”) in favor of BHP Petroleum, Inc. (“BHP”), which ruled that SAM Oil is not entitled to receive any revenue from BHP because SAM Oil’s revenue in a certain oil and gas well is subject to offset by a 300 percent nonconsent penalty. SAM Oil also challenges the Board’s denial of a petition for rehearing. The case raises questions regarding the imposition of a nonconsent penalty on SAM Oil, subsequent to its ratification of a voluntary operating agreement.

BHP is the suboperator…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Savage Industries, Inc. v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Application of KohlmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. The CALIFORNIA CO. v. BrittMississippi Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Traverse Oil Co. v. Chairman, Natural Resources CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Superior Oil Co. v. Humble Oil & Refining CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gadeco, LLC v. Industrial CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Bennion v. ANR Production Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Cowling v. Board of Oil, Gas & MiningUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Hegarty v. BD. OF OIL, GAS & MINING, DNRUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Rickert v. Dakota Sanitation PlusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API