Thompson v. Thompson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
Defendant’s contention is that the orders of Judge Bar-nette should be vacated inasmuch as the court did not have jurisdiction. The notice of appeal was filed by defendant on 24 August 1973, so it is sufficient to present for review the order of 14 August 1973. We do not determine the sufficiency of the notice of appeal with regard to the orders of Judge Bar-nette prior to that of 14 August 1973. We will, however, review the prior orders irrespective of the timeliness of appeal notice since the appeal is based on a question of jurisdiction.
The parties have stipulated that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cahoon v. BrinkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Cahoon v. . BrinkleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Leduc v. . SlocombSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
- Craver v. . SpaughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
3Cited by4 opinions
- Standard Equipment Co., Inc. v. AlbertsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Laroque v. LaroqueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Dalgewicz v. DalgewiczCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974