Legal Opinion

Cahoon v. . Brinkley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 11, 1918PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This was a motion to set aside a verdict and the judgment rendered thereon, for excusable neglect. The verdict and judgment were rendered at November Term, 1917, of Tyrrell. The motion to set aside for excusable neglect was heard over exception by plaintiff at Elizabeth City, 12 February, 1918.

The summons in the action, returnable to Tyrrell, was issued in May, 1915, and complaint was filed 15 September, 1917. An order extending time to file pleadings was made at each term, down to that time. The defendant employed W. M. Bond, Jr., then practising at Plymouth, in Washington County, to…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Roberts v. . AllmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Norton v. . McLaurinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  3. Pepper v. Clegg.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. Manning v. Roanoke & Tar River RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  5. Jarman v. . SaundersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Sutherland v. McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Whitaker v. . RainesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. Patterson v. PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Sutherland v. . McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. Craver v. . SpaughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API