Legal Opinion
O'DONNELL v. First Investors Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 18, 1995No. 94 Civ. 2839 (PKL)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge.
This is a motion brought by defendants First Investors Corporation (“FIC”) and Howard Froman (“Froman”) (together the “defendants”) seeking to compel arbitration, to stay the present action and to impose the cost of bringing this motion on plaintiff, James R. O’Donnell, Jr. (“O’Donnell”). Defendants argue that the underlying action brought by O’Donnell, concerning his employment contract, is subject to mandatory arbitration under National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (“NASD”) rules. Plaintiff maintains that actions involving employment…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Young v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Charles Zandford v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Incorporated John P. Graner, in His Individual and Representative CapacitiesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Cione v. Foresters Equity Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Robert L. Haskins, Sr. v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, A/K/A the Prudential Insurance and Financial ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Maye v. Smith Barney Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.