Legal Opinion

United States v. Valencia

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided March 10, 1989No. 88-337-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

SCOTT, District Judge.

The Defendants’ Joint Omnibus Motion raises first impression legal issues in this Circuit concerning inmate phone conversations recorded by prison officials. Defendants seek to suppress these taped conversations. Defendants argue that “carte blanche” recording of inmate phone conversations violates Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as well as the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Defendants also raise the Sixth Amendment, hearsay objections and finally 403 relevancy questions. At the request of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gilday v. DuboisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  2. William Langton and David Leblanc v. William Hogan, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  3. State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Breest v. DuBoisMassachusetts Superior Court · 1997
  5. Gilday v. DuboisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API