Legal Opinion

Frank v. Adams

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 6, 1953No. 1356PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff brought an action claiming $2,-125 for breach of contract. Defendant, by motion for summary judgment raised the defense of limitations, on the ground that the suit had been filed more than three years after the cause of action accrued. The motion was denied and the case proceeded to trial. The trial court again ruled against defendant on the plea of limitations and entered judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings this appeal.

As stated in the findings of fact made by the trial judge, the contract was made in March 1946 in California, and throughout that year…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fountain v. FilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Carter v. BurnsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. Filson v. FountainCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  4. Cvecich v. GiardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Filson v. FountainCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Namerdy v. GeneralcarDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Adams v. FrankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  3. District of Columbia v. FranklinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API