Legal Opinion

Petaluma Building Materials, Inc. v. Foremost Properties, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 20, 1960No. Civ. 18563PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

Petaluma Building Materials, Inc., sued Foremost Properties, Inc., and Pacific Queen Investment Company for $3,936.21, which plaintiff alleged to be the unpaid balance due and owing on a $7,886.21 contract according to the terms of which plaintiff had furnished defendants with materials used in the erection of a work of improvement on real property. Plaintiff further alleged the filing of a claim of lien against said real property and prayed that the above sum be adjudged a lien thereon. Defendants Foremost Prop erties, Inc., and Pacific Queen Investment Company answered, admitting their…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Powers v. Board of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Colbert v. ColbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Fraenkel v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Estate of KayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. J. S. Schirm Co. v. Rollingwood Homes Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
  2. B. & J. Construction Co. v. Spacious Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Contractors Dump Truck Service, Inc. v. Gregg Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Re-Bar Contractors, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Ewing Irrigation Products v. Rohnert Park Golf Course Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API