Legal Opinion

Starr v. Hagglund

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1962No. 246PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOND, Justice.

A schedule of transitional measures appended to the Alaska constitution provides in section 20 that “The capital of the State of Alaska shall be at Juneau.” The appellants, Starr and Bailey, are sponsors of an initiative petition to move the capital from its present location to some place in Western Alaska.1 At the instance of ap-*317pellees, the Secretary of State was enjoined by the superior court from placing the proposition on the ballot for submission to the voters of Alaska. The basis of the court’s action was its determination that section 20 could not be amended or revised…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Duplex Printing Press Co. v. DeeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Matthews v. Quinton Ex Rel. QuintonAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Knudsen v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Falcon v. Alaska Public Offices CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Trustees for Alaska v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Wien Air Alaska v. ArantAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Boucher v. EngstromAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. LewisAlaska Supreme Court · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API