United States v. George Spraul & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio. Uibel by the United States against 275 cases of tomato catsup, more or less,-claimed by George Spraul & Co. From a decree dismissing the libel for want of an allegation of previous seizure, the United States brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.
The United States filed this libel in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio *406under the Food and Drugs Act of June 30, 1906, c. 3915, 34 Stat. 768 (U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1909, p. 1187), for the seizure and condemnation of the articles named in the above title.
Section 10 of the act referred to provides:
“That any article of food, drug, or liquor, that is adulterated or misbranded within the meaning of this act, and is being transported from one state, territory, district, or insular possession to another for sale, or. having been transported,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Dobbins's Distillery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Gelston v. HoytSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
- The Confiscation CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- The Brig Ann, McLain, MasterSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
- The Rio GrandeSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. 62 Packages, More or LessDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1943
- United States v. Eighteen Cases of Tuna FishDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1925
- United States v. One Hundred Barrels of VinegarDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1911
- The Motor Vessel K. 22845Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- United States v. One Floating Fish TrapDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.