Legal Opinion
Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. Donohoo
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 12, 1937No. 24954PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAYLESS, V. C. J.
Kathryne Donohoo filed an action in the district court of Tulsa county, Okla., against Joseph Donohoo and Ollie A. Donohoo, her father and mother, and Midland Savings & Loan Company, a corporation, to foreclose a mortgage upon certain real estate. The parents did not defend the action. The company filed an answer and cross-petition, wherein it claimed title to the property, and assailed plaintiff’s note and mortgage as being without consideration, and 'as having been exe cuted and delivered in fraud of creditors. Judgment was for plaintiff, and the company appeals.
The history…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Watashe v. TigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Oklahoma State Bank of Wapanucka v. BurnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Forbes v. BeckerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Milburn v. Miners' & Citizens' BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Milburn v. Miners' & Citizens' BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Soter v. Griesedieck Western Brewery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Knapp v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
- Nelms v. NewtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Karchmer v. UngerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939