Legal Opinion

Molinaro v. Watkins-Johnson CEI Division

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 5, 1973No. Civ. A. No. 72-589-NPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORTHROP, Chief Judge.

The instant suit is a patent case in which plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, have alleged that certain equipment sold by the defendant violates their patent. The equipment is the MD-104 Auto-Scan Receiver and a modification kit for field conversion of any RS-111-1B Series system into an RS-111-1B-17. Defendant, after filing its answer, moved for summary judgment on the basis that only twenty of the accused devices were sold, eighteen being sold to the United States Government and two to foreign governments. After two hearings on that motion, this Court, 359 F.Supp. 467,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Deepsouth Packing Co. v. Laitram Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. General Tire & Rubber Co. v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  3. Moss v. Associated Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
  4. Laitram Corporation v. Deepsouth Packing CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1968
  5. Baker v. Waterman S. S. Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Matter of Will of HesterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Moses I. Lewis, Jr. v. Morris Thigpen, Commissioner, Department of Corrections, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  3. F & G Scrolling Mouse, L.L.C. v. IBM Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1999
  4. Organic Chemicals, Inc. v. Carroll Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1980
  5. Kahn v. General Motors Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API