Legal Opinion

Francis v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 12, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Amended petition unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Respondents’ motion to dismiss the amended petition for lack of personal jurisdiction should have been granted. Petitioner served the amended petition by mail upon the Attorney General and the Oneida County Attorney, but served none of the respondents. “Absent a court order authorizing such service, petitioner did not obtain personal jurisdiction over respondents by serving the petition by mail upon the Attorney-General and the [Oneida] County Attorney” (Matter of Lowrance v Coughlin, 190 AD2d 915; see, Matter of Jarvis v…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jarvis v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Jones v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Lowrance v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Schmitt v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of Woodies v. Department of Motor VehiclesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API