Legal Opinion

Schmitt v. Perales

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 18, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Petition unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: Pursuant to CPLR 7804 (g), we consider respondents’ contention that the petition should be dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction (see, Matter of Desmone v Blum, 99 AD2d 170; 8 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac ¶ 7804.09). Be*1042cause the notice of petition failed to set forth the time and place of the scheduled hearing on the petition, personal jurisdiction was not acquired over respondents and the petition should have been dismissed (see, Travis v New York State Dept. of Envtl. Conservation, 185 AD2d 714; Matter of RECYCLE v…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Desmone v. BlumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Recycle v. LacatenaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Travis v. New York State Department of Environmental ConservationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hunter's Crossing Neighborhood Ass'n v. MaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Francis v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API