Legal Opinion

F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 9, 1966No. R.D. 11169; Entry No. 16886PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Judge:

The merchandise involved in this appeal for reappraisement consists of two kinds of linoleum, natural tan and *716sea green, exported from the United Kingdom on or about December 7, 1960, and entered at the port of Philadelphia on December 30, 1960.1 It was appraised on the basis of export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956. The merchandise is not on the final list (T.D. 54521). Plaintiff does not contest the basis of valuation but only the amount thereof. The following are the appraised…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brentwood Originals v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. National Carloading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. A. W. Fenton Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  5. BMC Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API