Legal Opinion
PUE v. NEW JERSEY DEPT. OF LABOR
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 1, 2023No. 3:23-cv-00855Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ANTHONY B. PUE, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 23-855 (RK) (DEA) v. MEMORANDUM OPINION NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, et al., Defendants. KIRSCH, District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court by way of three motions filed by multiple Defendants! in this matter, (ECF Nos: 12, 13 and 15), to dismiss pro se Plaintiff Anthony B. Pue’s (“Pue”) Amended Complaint, (““Am. Compl.,” ECF No. 4). Plaintiff opposed, (ECF Nos. 14 and 19), to which two defendants replied (ECF Nos. 21 and 22).” The Court has considered the parties’…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.