Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Dana Nance & Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 2007No. 26736Published

1Opinion of the Court

153 P.3d 1091 (2007)

Charles BROOKS and Donna Brooks, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

DANA NANCE & CO. and Fidelity National Field Services, Inc., successor to Chicago Title Co., Inc., Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Claimants-Appellants/Cross-Claim Defendants, and

Seasons Mortgage, Inc., Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Claim Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Claimant, and

ACS Government Services, Inc. fka Computer Data Systems, Inc. aka CDSI, Defendant.

No. 26736.

Supreme Court of Hawai`i.

January 12, 2007.

Michael L. Lam, Lauren R. Sharkey, Seth R. Harris (of Case Bigelow & Lombardi), on the briefs, Honolulu, for…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & AssociatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Pleasant v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Tabieros v. Clark Equipment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Hac v. University of Hawai'iHawaii Supreme Court · 2003

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API