Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (1990)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided May 14, 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Representatives Mantzer

¶ 0 The Attorney General has received your letter asking for an official opinion addressing the following questions:

1. Under the terms of Chapter 176, 1 of the 1985 OklahomaSession Laws (Senate Bill No. 284), and the terms of Chapter 178,29 of the same 1985 Oklahoma Session Laws (House Bill No. 1164),both of which purported to amend 59 O.S. 164 (1981), and bothof which appear in the published supplements to the Oklahomastatutes, is the Board of Chiropractic Examiners required toexamine prospective practitioners in the specified areas setforth in Senate Bill No. 284…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. AMF Tubescope Company v. HatchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Magnolia Pipe Line Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  3. Oklahoma Ass'n of Municipal Attorneys v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
  4. Gulf Oil Company v. WoodsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  5. City of Tulsa v. SmittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API