Friedberg v. Insurance Co. of North America
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.
In this suit on a policy of insurance for loss of jewelry, defendant had judgment in a trial, September, 1930, without a jury. Plaintiff has appealed. The policy has a limitation that suit must be commenced within 12 months next after the happening of the loss. The loss happened on or about November 1,1927. Suit was commenced on April 3, 1929. The question is. that the suit was barred by the limitation.
Loss was reported promptly to the local agent, who in turn reported to defendant’s branch man ager in charge of adjustment. Defendant stalled, admittedly, for considerable time after loss,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dahrooge v. Rochester German InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Betteys v. Ætna Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by24 opinions
- Rory v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- Scheetz v. IMT Ins. Co.(Mut.)Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- Prudential Fire Ins. Co. v. Trave-Taylor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Cincinnati Insurance v. Citizens InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- Better Valu Homes, Inc. v. Preferred Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.