Legal Opinion
Scott v. BRODER BROS. CO., INC.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 14, 2001No. 119066, COA No. 230225Published
1Opinion of the Court
636 N.W.2d 749 (2001)
Audrey SCOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BRODER BROTHERS COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Docket No. 119066, COA No. 230225.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
December 14, 2001.
On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the March 30, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
2Concurrence · TaylorTaylor, J.
I join in the Court's order to deny leave. I respectfully disagree with Justice Kelly's dissenting statement because, although she cites Mudel v. Great Atlantic &…
Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence · Cavanagh.
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Mudel v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Holden v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Goff v. Bil-Mar Foods, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
- Gardner v. Van Buren Public SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Woody v. Cello-Foil ProductsMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.